Podcast episode
How InMobi Is Reinventing Advertising with AI Agents
agent-framework ai-in-adtech dsp measurement programmatic
TL;DR
Ari Paparo interviews Abhay Singhal, co-founder and CEO of InMobi Advertising, recorded at Cannes. The conversation covers InMobi's push into "agentic advertising" — AI agents making media-buying decisions via a new Agentic Selling Platform — plus the Glance shopping product's expansion to Samsung TVs and the acquisition of MobileAction, an Apple Search Ads (ASA) reseller. Substantive for mobile and CTV practitioners; lighter on hard data than it is on vision-selling.
What was covered
-
Agentic Selling Platform: Abhay Singhal described a new platform allowing buy-side operators to connect their own AI agents directly to InMobi's exchange via an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server, automating deal creation, audience segmentation, and RTB (real-time bidding — the auction system that prices individual ad impressions) filtering through natural-language or code-based interfaces rather than traditional DSP (demand-side platform) UIs.
-
Future of DSPs: Singhal argued that DSPs as click-and-configure tools are becoming obsolete; the next interface layer will be conversational AI or direct agent-to-agent integration, raising questions about where DSP vendors fit in a fully agentic workflow.
-
Funnel compression from AI agents: Singhal's core thesis: as AI agents handle consumer research, the mid-funnel "awareness and consideration" phase collapses, forcing advertisers to show up closer to the point of transaction rather than investing in top-funnel discovery.
-
Glance + Samsung TV partnership: Glance, InMobi's consumer-facing AI shopping product (currently embedded on mobile lock screens), is launching on 50 million+ Samsung TVs globally. Singhal said Glance is one of three partners Samsung is integrating, alongside Microsoft Copilot and Perplexity. The monetization model is primarily performance/affiliate — paid on conversion rather than impression.
-
MobileAction acquisition: InMobi acquired MobileAction, a San Francisco-based ~30-person firm that was one of a handful of Apple Search Ads resellers, giving InMobi access to ASA keyword bidding, analytics, and intelligence for app developers. No financial terms disclosed.
-
Conversational CTV ads (Fossil case study): InMobi wrapped standard advertiser creatives in a conversational AI layer, enabling consumers to ask questions before clicking through. Singhal cited "about 30% overall lift" and richer engagement data compared with traditional CTV ad formats.
Notable claims & predictions
-
Abhay Singhal: "The whole component of advertising that used to come in during the process of research is going to get eliminated" — arguing that AI agents doing the research on behalf of consumers will wipe out the discovery/consideration phase of the funnel as a viable ad environment.
-
Abhay Singhal: "The era of pressing 10 buttons is very clearly over" — asserting that traditional DSP UI workflows are effectively dead, replaced by conversational or agent-driven interfaces.
-
Abhay Singhal on Glance/Samsung: Glance will be live on 50 million+ Samsung TVs globally and is one of only three partners (with Copilot and Perplexity) Samsung is integrating, positioning it as a primary AI shopping layer on the world's largest TV OEM.
-
Abhay Singhal on conversational CTV: InMobi is seeing "about 30% overall lift" from layering conversational AI on top of standard CTV creatives, across tens of advertisers — framed as among the most credible real-world examples of "ads in AI."
-
Abhay Singhal on top-of-funnel discovery: "As the search is kind of going away and consumers are interacting through chat interfaces, one has to ask how does somebody enter the top of the funnel?" — suggesting search-driven discovery is structurally declining, and visual/agentic surfaces like Glance are the answer.
Fact check
-
Claim (Singhal): Glance will be on "50 million plus Samsung TVs across the world" and is one of three Samsung-integrated partners alongside Copilot and Perplexity. Unverified. This announcement was made at Cannes. No independent confirmation of the 50M figure or the three-partner structure was available in the transcript. The 50M number is plausible given Samsung's installed base, but it reads as a forward-looking target or total addressable fleet rather than an active rollout figure. Readers should treat it as a stated target pending Samsung's own announcement.
-
Claim (Singhal): "About 30% overall lift" from conversational CTV ads, across "tens of advertisers." Unverified; speaker has a conflicting incentive. Singhal is CEO of the company selling this product. No methodology, baseline metric, or third-party validation was described — it's unclear whether "lift" means brand recall, click-through rate, conversion, or something else. The "tens of advertisers" qualifier is also vague. Treat as a preliminary internal result, not an externally validated benchmark.
-
Claim (Singhal): MobileAction was "one of the three companies in the ecosystem" authorized to bid on Apple Search Ads keywords on behalf of developers. Contested/incomplete. Apple's Search Ads Partner Program has historically included more than three resellers/API partners. Singhal may be describing a more restricted tier or a specific regional arrangement. The claim as stated overstates MobileAction's exclusivity; listeners should not assume InMobi has acquired a near-monopoly Apple reseller.
-
Claim (Singhal): "Search is kind of going away." True but heavily overstated. Google Search revenue grew year-over-year in its most recent earnings, and search remains the largest single digital ad format globally per IAB and Magna data. AI-powered chat interfaces are eroding some query volume at the margin, but "going away" is a significant leap — and one that conveniently supports InMobi's pitch for Glance as a top-of-funnel replacement.
Why this matters for ad-tech operators
-
DSP disintermediation is now a vendor talking point, not just analyst speculation. InMobi — an exchange/SSP (supply-side platform, software publishers use to sell ad space) — is explicitly building MCP-based agent integrations that let buyers bypass traditional DSP UIs. If this architecture scales, SSPs capturing buy-side intelligence directly could commoditize or bypass DSP middleware, compressing margins for platforms like The Trade Desk and DV360.
-
Apple Search Ads is a fast-growing, relatively closed channel. The MobileAction acquisition signals that mobile DSPs see ASA as a must-have managed channel. Publishers and app developers should watch whether InMobi bundles ASA with its DSP offering, which could shift app-install budget allocation away from open-auction mobile programmatic toward walled-garden keyword inventory.
-
Conversational ad formats on CTV are early but moving. The Fossil case study represents a novel insertion point — wrapping standard creative in a chat layer before the landing-page click. If the 30% lift figure holds up to scrutiny, this could pressure CTV publishers and measurement firms to support new engagement metrics beyond completion rate and click-through.
-
Glance's Samsung TV deal raises the stakes for CTV shopping. A Perplexity + Copilot + Glance triumvirate embedded at the OS level on Samsung TVs — the world's top-selling TV brand — could reshape how retail media and affiliate commerce flows through the living room, directly competing with Amazon's and Roku's shoppable TV ambitions. Publishers and retail media networks should monitor Samsung's rollout timing closely.
Full analysis
At Cannes, InMobi CEO Abhay Singhal laid out a bet that AI agents will hollow out the middle of the marketing funnel — and, more provocatively, that the traditional demand-side platform (DSP, the software buyers use to purchase ads) is on its way out, replaced by AI agents talking directly to an ad exchange. He's backing the vision with a new "Agentic Selling Platform," a Samsung TV shopping deal, and an Apple Search Ads acquisition.
What's actually being decided by operators here: not "should we believe InMobi," but how fast the agent-to-exchange plumbing and funnel-compression story becomes something you have to staff for. This is a Type 2, reversible question for most operators — you can watch and move — but the underlying architecture shift is Type 1 if it takes hold. No hard forcing function beyond the competitive clock.
The Market Analyst
Follow the margin. InMobi is a supply-side player arguing the buy-side software layer is obsolete — of course it is. If buyers wire their own agents straight into exchanges via an MCP server (a standard way for AI agents to plug into external tools), the fee that sits with The Trade Desk and Google's DV360 is the thing under threat. In plain terms: the toll booth in the middle of the ad-buying road might get bypassed. But note the counterprogramming at the same event — Google's Brian Jankovsky pitched more infrastructure, not less. The incumbents aren't conceding the interface. Watch whether any real buy-side budget flows through agent integrations in 2026, or whether this stays a keynote.
The Skeptic
The load-bearing assumption is "search is going away," and the episode's own fact-check dismantles it — Google search revenue still grew last quarter and remains the largest ad format on earth. Everything downstream (Glance as the new top-of-funnel, funnel collapse, DSP death) rests on that overstatement. The 30% lift on conversational CTV comes from the CEO selling the product, with no baseline, no methodology, no third party. The "50 million Samsung TVs" is a fleet size, not a rollout. And "one of three Apple Search Ads partners" overstates exclusivity. This is vision-selling at Cannes. Strip the hyperbole and you have three early, unproven products.
The Operator
Tuesday morning, the interesting thing here isn't the vision — it's the plumbing. An SSP exposing deal creation, audience segmentation, and RTB filtering through an agent interface is a real integration project, and the meeting notes show exactly what it looks like in practice: securing test accounts, webhook endpoints, red-teaming an agent that dispatches long-running tasks. That's the unglamorous reality behind "the era of pressing 10 buttons is over." The other operator signal buried in those notes: enabling multi-format auctions caused Magnite, TripleLift, and Sharethrough to drop display revenue hard. Translation — supply-side experiments break demand-partner integrations first. Agentic buying will hit the same wall: your agent is only as good as the partners who honor its calls.
The Customer / End User
Two customers here, and they want different things. The advertiser doesn't want to write code to buy media — they want fewer buttons, yes, but they also want auditability, brand safety, and someone to blame when spend goes sideways. An agent making bidding decisions in a black box is a trust problem, not a convenience win. The consumer on a Samsung TV is the bigger question: are people actually going to converse with an ad, or shop from their lock screen? Glance is monetized on conversion, not impressions — a healthy sign that InMobi is being honest that this only pays if people actually buy. That's the whole ballgame, and it's unproven.
The CFO
The MobileAction deal is the tell. No terms disclosed, ~30 people, buying into Apple Search Ads — a fast-growing but walled channel. That's a cheap, sensible bolt-on: own a managed channel, bundle it, capture app-install budget. Real economics, near-term payback. Contrast that with the Agentic Selling Platform and Glance, which are R&D bets funded by story. The affiliate model on Glance means revenue only shows up on conversion — great for InMobi's risk, brutal on near-term revenue predictability. For any operator tempted to copy this: the ASA-style acquisition pays back; building an agent interface ahead of buyer demand is a cost center until buyers show up.
The tensions
-
Is the DSP dying or just changing clothes? The Market Analyst sees a genuine margin threat if agents bypass the middle layer. Google, same week, argued the opposite — the future needs more infrastructure, not less. Both can't be right about who owns the interface.
-
Funnel compression: structural or self-serving? Best Buy's Patrick Albano makes the same funnel-collapse argument from the retail-media side, which lends it credibility. But the Skeptic notes it conveniently sells Glance. Corroboration from a second Cannes stage isn't independence when everyone's pitching the same trend.
-
Vision vs. plumbing. The Operator's read is that the boring integration work — webhooks, partner compatibility, red-teaming — decides whether any of this ships, and demand partners breaking on format changes is the leading indicator of how agent adoption will actually go.
Synthesis
This hinges on two beliefs: (1) buyers will genuinely route budget through agent-to-exchange integrations rather than DSP UIs, and (2) consumers will transact on new conversational/visual surfaces. Belief 1 has real architectural momentum and the internal meeting notes show the plumbing is buildable. Belief 2 is pure hope right now. The council leans toward: the agent plumbing is real and worth staffing to understand; the funnel-collapse and consumer-behavior claims are marketing until proven. Before committing anything, operators should demand a methodology on that 30% lift and watch whether any named buyer publicly routes real spend through an agent integration — not a pilot, real budget.
Prediction: By InMobi's next major update at CES in January 2027, no independent buy-side spender will have publicly disclosed material ad budget routed through InMobi's Agentic Selling Platform (agent-to-exchange, bypassing a DSP) — it will remain a demo-and-keynote story, not a booked-revenue channel.
Confidence: Medium — Cannes vision-selling with unverified metrics rarely converts to disclosed spend within two quarters.
Why: The episode is heavy on vision and light on data — the fact-check flags every headline claim as unverified or overstated, and the "30% lift" comes from the vendor with no methodology. Agent-to-exchange buying also fails the Operator's compatibility test: the same meeting notes show demand partners breaking when an SSP changes auction mechanics, and buyers won't route real money through a black-box agent without auditability and brand-safety guarantees. The opposite outcome — a named advertiser disclosing real agentic spend by January — would require both the technical plumbing and buyer trust to mature in under six months, which the evidence doesn't support; the safer path (the MobileAction ASA bolt-on) is where near-term revenue actually sits.
Revisit by 2027-01-31: We're right if no independent buyer has publicly disclosed material spend through the Agentic Selling Platform by CES 2027. We're wrong if a named advertiser or agency confirms real (non-pilot) budget flowing through it.
Comments